The author of this piece is Jack Riemer
of the Houston Chronicle
On Nov. 18, 1995, Itzhak Perlman,
the violinist, came on stage to give a concert at Avery Fisher Hall at
Lincoln Center in New York City. If you have
ever been to a Perlman concert, you know that getting on stage is no small
achievement for him. He was stricken with polio as a child, and so he has
braces on both legs and walks with the aid of two crutches. To see him
walk across the stage one step at a time, painfully and slowly, is an
unforgettable sight. He walks painfully, yet majestically, until he
reaches his chair. Then he sits down, slowly, puts his crutches on the
floor, undoes the clasps on his legs, tucks one foot back and extends the
other foot
forward. Then he bends down and picks up the violin, puts it under his chin,
nods to the conductor and proceeds to play.
By now, the audience is used to
this ritual. They sit quietly while he makes his way across the stage to his
chair. They remain reverently silent while he undoes the clasps on his legs.
They wait until he is ready to play. But this time, something went
wrong. Just as he finished the first few bars, one of the strings on his
violin broke. You could hear it snap -- it went off like gunfire across the
room. There was no mistaking what that sound meant.
There was no mistaking what he
had to do.
People who were there that night
thought to themselves: "We figured that he would have to get up, put on
the clasps again, pick up the crutches and limp his way off stage -- to
either find another violin or else find another string for this one."
But he didn't. Instead, he waited
a moment, closed his eyes and then he played with such passion and such
power and such purity as they had never heard before. Of course, anyone
knows that it is impossible to play a symphonic work with just three
strings. I know that, and you know that, but that night Itzhak Perlman
refused to know that. You could see him modulating, changing, recomposing
the piece in his head. At one point, it sounded like he was de-tuning the
strings to get new sounds from them that they had never made before. When he
finished, there was an awesome silence in the room. And then people rose and
cheered. There was an extraordinary outburst of applause from every corner
of the auditorium. We were all on our feet, screaming and cheering, doing
everything we could to show how much we appreciated what he had done. He
smiled, wiped the sweat from this brow, raised his bow to quiet us, and then
he said, not boastfully, but in a quiet, pensive, reverent tone, "You
know, sometimes it is the artist's task to find out how much music you can
still make with what you have left."
What a powerful line that is. It
has stayed in my mind ever since I heard it. And who knows? Perhaps that is
the [way] of life - not just for artists but for all of us.
So, perhaps our task in this
shaky, fast-changing, bewildering world in which we live is to make music,
at first with all that we have, and then, when that is no longer possible,
to make music with what we have left. |